Baget

Samuel Jefroykin6 min read

Consulting, fractional work, or a first product: three shapes after corporate

Consulting, fractional work, and a first product are three answers to the same question: what do you sell, now that it is not your time in one company? Consulting sells your expertise in scoped projects, and is usually the fastest route to a first invoice because it is closest to the job you left. Fractional work sells the same expertise as an ongoing part-time role for one to three companies, steadier but slower to land. A first product, whether a productized service or something you build, is the slowest to earn and the only one of the three that becomes an asset that is not your CV. Most people who make this work do not pick one forever. They pick the one closest to their expertise first, and let it fund the more independent thing. Here is how to choose in your situation.

What is the actual difference between the three?

Consulting is project-shaped: a defined problem, a scoped deliverable, an end date. You are hired for judgment you already have. The work resembles your old job with the politics swapped for pipeline: when a project ends, the next one is not automatic.

Fractional work is role-shaped: a part-time version of the job title you used to hold, for a company too small to need it full time. You attend the meetings, own the outcomes, carry the pager for your function. It is the steadiest of the three and the least autonomous: you have a boss again, just a smaller slice of one, times two or three.

A first product is business-shaped, and the word product is doing light work here: for most people it is a productized service, the same offer delivered the same way at the same price, sold to strangers rather than scoped per client. It is the only one of the three where what you build accrues to you rather than to a client. It is also the only one where you start at zero credibility, because your title does not transfer.

Which one fits your runway?

Runway is the deciding variable, and it deserves a number, not a feeling. We wrote the full decision page for the job-versus-own-thing question, including the cases where a job wins: after a career break, job or business? The short version for this page:

Consulting fits the shortest runway of the three. Your first client is usually someone who already knows your work, which means the sales cycle is a series of coffees, not a funnel. If your runway is real but you would sleep better with revenue this quarter, start here.

Fractional fits a medium runway and a strong network. The roles exist but they move slowly, they are won on references, and there are fewer of them than the LinkedIn discourse suggests. Budget months of conversations before the first retainer, and treat any faster outcome as luck, not plan.

A first product fits the longest runway and the strongest appetite for autonomy. Finding out what strangers will pay for takes a season at minimum, and no tool shortens that part, ours included. If autonomy is the whole point of your exit, this is the destination; the honest question is whether you go there directly or via one of the other two.

What does each one demand that your old job did not?

Consulting demands scoping and the discipline to say no. The skill that fails ex-corporate consultants is not expertise, it is boundaries: unscoped work, unpaid discovery, projects that quietly become jobs.

Fractional demands one good anchor client and the references to get it. It also demands honesty with yourself about whether you want a smaller version of employment or actually want out; there is no wrong answer, but they lead different places.

A first product demands the four jobs every business demands: setup, building the offer, finding out what sells, growing customers. We wrote that guide here: the four jobs of starting a business For you the phrase "no experience" is wrong in an instructive way: you have plenty, but the market for your product does not care about your title, and that reset is the real cost of this path.

Do you need to feel ready first?

No, and waiting to is the most expensive habit on this list. The people we talk to in your situation rarely lack competence; they lack the external structure that used to confirm it. A title, a team, a calendar full of meetings that implied importance. All three shapes replace that with something quieter: a client who pays you again.

The practical consequence: your first paid engagement, however small, will do more for your confidence than another month of positioning work. Structure the first month around getting one, not around the website.

Can you combine them?

Yes, and the common sequence is exactly that: consulting or a fractional role covers the floor while the product gets built in the protected hours. The version that fails is the even split, a third of your energy to each, on the theory that you will decide later. Pick which one gets your best hours this quarter and give the others the leftovers on purpose. The decision page's rule applies here unchanged.

One warning from our own record: the deciding and positioning work takes longer than you think even when the building is fast. When we built a small business with our own product this summer, the storefront existed within days; the human decisions about what to sell, to whom, at what price, took longer than the building, and they were the part that mattered. The full record is public: we built a real business in 7 days with baget

What about the setup grind?

This is the part of your hesitation that is now mostly obsolete, and we say that as the interested party, so check the claim against the record above. The storefront, the positioning page, the checkout, the booking: describe the offer in one sentence and a team builds them while you keep your hours for clients. What remains yours is what was always the real work: deciding what you sell, and asking people to buy it. If the setup grind is the reason the exit plan has stayed a plan, that reason is gone, which is clarifying, because whatever hesitation remains is about the asking, and the asking only gets easier by doing it.

How do you test one without burning the runway?

Give it thirty days and one scoped offer. For consulting: write the one-paragraph description of a project you could deliver, and put it in front of five former colleagues, asking directly. For fractional: three conversations with founders in your network about what a part-time version of your function would change for them. For a product: the smallest sellable version of the idea, live enough that a stranger could pay, shown to the specific people it serves. In all three cases the test is the ask, not the artifact. Thirty days of asks tells you more than a quarter of research, and it costs runway measured in weeks, not months.

Describe what you would sell in one sentence, and see the storefront, positioning and checkout built while you keep your hours for clients. It costs nothing to look.